With the same model geometry consisting of 129 faces (a house with blind windows, blind doors and some dormers) one computer delivers a resultshape of type TopAbs_SHELL (right) while the other delivers a TopAbs_COMPOUND (wrong) consisting of 7(!) shells.
I compared source code, model geometry, OCC library version and computer setup between both machines and they are identical as far as I can see. Am I overlooking something? Is there some non-deterministic behavior in the SewedShape() method?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Discussion
1 archived reply
Posts are displayed in their archived order.
01Commenter-1
Dear i1015191,
I would like to confirm that sewing is a deterministic algorithm and with the same input data it gives the same result.
All input data should be checked including tolerances of input vertices , edges and faces.
So, I may just suggest you to debug carefully both cases and try to identify the real reason (may be hidden at the moment) of described anomaly.