Getting rid of generic classes in Visualization

The git branch CR23959 is ready to be reviewed.

Generic classes replaced with template classes:
1) Prs3d_WFShape,
2) Prs3d_Point

Classes in StdPrs replaced with simple classes (as they implement generic classes from Prs3d):
1) StdPrs_WFRestrictedFace (implements Prs3d_WFRestrictedFace generic class)
2) StdPrs_HLRShape (implements Prs3d_HLRShape generic class)
3) DsgPrs_DatumPrs (implements Prs3d_Datum genetic class)

Classes deleted as empty and unused:
1) Prs3d_SectionShapeTool
2) Prs3d_PointTool
3) Prs3d_LineTool
4) Prs3d_HLRShapeTool
5) Prs3d_VectorTool
6) Prs3d_DatumTool
7) Prs3d_RestrictionTool

Classes removed as unused:
1) Prs3d_CurvePresentation
2) Prs3d_Vector
3) Prs3d_Line

Classes removed as unused (this functionality exists in StdPrs already):
1) Prs3d_WFDeflectionRestrictedFace

Dear san, please review.

Branch CR23959 reviewed with the following remark:

- src/StdPrs/StdPrs_WFDeflectionShape.hxx, src/StdPrs/StdPrs_WFShape.hxx, src/StdPrs/StdPrs_Point.hxx, src/StdPrs/StdPrs_Vertex.hxx: typedef is preferred over #define, it provides type information to the compiler so the latter can produce more meaningful messages.

In files:
src/StdPrs/StdPrs_WFDeflectionShape.hxx,
src/StdPrs/StdPrs_WFShape.hxx,
src/StdPrs/StdPrs_Point.hxx,
src/StdPrs/StdPrs_Vertex.hxx

define directive was changed to typedef.

Dear san, please review.

Branch CR23959 reviewed without remarks, ready for testing.

Dear Commenter 1,

Branch CR23959 was compiled on Linux platform.
There are following extraction errors:
http://jenkins-test-02.nnov.opencascade.com:8080/user/mnt/my-views/view/CR23959/job/mnt-CR23959-master_prepare_occt_linux/1/parsed_console/?

Dear Commenter 1,
Branch CR23959 was recompiled on Linux platform.
Extraction step is good now.
Branch CR23959 will be compiled and tested now.

Dear Commenter 1,

Branch CR23959 was compiled on Linux platform.
There are following compilation errors:
http://jenkins-test-02.nnov.opencascade.com:8080/user/mnt/my-views/view/CR23959/job/mnt-CR23959-master_build_occt_linux/1/parsed_console/?

Compilation errors were corrected.
The git branch CR23959 was updated.
Dear san, please review.

Branch CR23959 reviewed without remarks, ready for testing.

Dear Commenter 1,

Branch CR23959 (and products from GIT master) was compiled on Linux and Windows platforms and tested.
[revision removed]

Number of compiler warnings:

occt component :
Linux: 2 (2 on master)
Windows: 7 (7 on master)

products component :
Linux: 0 (0 on master)
Windows: 63 (63 on master)

Regressions:
http://occt-tests/CR23959-master-occt/Windows-32-VC9/bugs/vis/bug23747_1.html
bugs vis(004) bug23747_1 - BAD.

Improvements:
No improvements

Testing cases:
Not needed

Testing on Linux:
Total MEMORY difference: 366497096 / 366248232
Total CPU difference: 45936.57000000106 / 41752.48000000117

Testing on Windows:
Total MEMORY difference: 415872024 / 417160992
Total CPU difference: 43948.4375 / 41088.75

There are not differences in images found by testdiff.

Dear Commenter 1,

Test case bugs/vis(004)/bug23747_1 is not stable, it is OK "by hands".
Branch CR23959 is tested.

Dear Commenter 1,
Branch CR23959 was updated.
In DsgPrs_DatumPrs incorrect marker drawing in the origin of trihedron was fixed.
Could you please test it once more?

Dear Commenter 1,

Branch CR23959 was compiled on Linux platform.
There are following compilation error:
In file included from ../../../../src/DsgPrs/DsgPrs_DatumPrs.cxx:18:


../../../../inc/DsgPrs_DatumPrs.hxx:32: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘gp_Ax2’ with no type

../../../../inc/DsgPrs_DatumPrs.hxx:32: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘&’ token

../../../../src/DsgPrs/DsgPrs_DatumPrs.cxx:31: error: prototype for ‘void DsgPrs_DatumPrs::Add(const Handle_Prs3d_Presentation&, const gp_Ax2&, const Handle_Prs3d_Drawer&)’ does not match any in class ‘DsgPrs_DatumPrs’

../../../../inc/DsgPrs_DatumPrs.hxx:30: error: candidate is: static void DsgPrs_DatumPrs::Add(const Handle_Prs3d_Presentation&, int)


make[2]: *** [DsgPrs_DatumPrs.lo] Error 1

Compilation errors were corrected. The git branch was updated.

Dear san, please review.

Branch CR23959 reviewed without remarks, ready for testing.

Dear Commenter 1,

Branch CR23959 (and products from GIT master) was compiled on Linux and Windows platforms and tested.

Number of compiler warnings:

occt component :
Linux: 2 (2 on master)
Windows: 7 (7 on master)

products component :
Linux: 0 (0 on master)
Windows: 63 (63 on master)

Regressions:
No regressions

Improvements:
No improvements

Testing cases:
Not needed

Testing on Linux:
Total MEMORY difference: 366580304 / 364462604
Total CPU difference: 43905.89000000086 / 41174.07000000086

Testing on Windows:
Total MEMORY difference: 414606788 / 413497168
Total CPU difference: 36272.75 / 34944.171875

There are not differences in images found by testdiff.