DiscussionsIssue archiveOCCT:Documentation

Archived issue #0033596

Documentation - Incorrect default value read.step.tessellated

CommunityOCCT:Documentationverified5 public notes

Search issues

Description

I found the user guide reports the default value of read.step.tessellated as 0. This looks like a typo.
In my testing, the default value is 1.

Suggest to change existing text:
"Default value is 0 (On)."
to
"Default value is 1 (On)."

Steps to reproduce

https://dev.opencascade.org/doc/overview/html/occt_user_guides__step.html

See the section on read.step.tessellated under "Setting the translation parameters".

Public activity

5 archived notes

Participants are labeled by their role within this record.

01Commenter 2
Branch [archived branch] has been created by Participant.

[revision removed]


Detailed log of new commits:

Author: ichesnok
Date: Fri Mar 8 19:09:56 2024 +0000

    0033596: Documentation - Incorrect default value read.step.tessellated
    
    Default value of read.step.tessellated corrected.
02Commenter 2
Dear Commenter 3,
please review branch CR33596
03Commenter 3
Dear bugmster,
please integrate:
OCCT:CR33596
PROD: NO

No tests are needed
04Commenter 1
Combination -
OCCT branch : [archived branch]
master SHA - [revision removed]
[revision removed]
Products branch : [archived branch] SHA - [revision removed]
was compiled on Linux, MacOS and Windows platforms and tested in optimize mode.

Number of compiler warnings:
No new/fixed warnings

Regressions/Differences/Improvements:
No regressions/differences

CPU differences:
Ubuntu2004-64:
OCCT
Total CPU difference: 18392.76999999986 / 18052.86999999987 [+1.88%]
Products
Total CPU difference: 11191.209999999957 / 11393.919999999946 [-1.78%]
Windows-64-VC142:
OCCT
Total CPU difference: 20708.453125 / 20444.125 [+1.29%]
Products
Total CPU difference: 12623.671875 / 12572.140625 [+0.41%]


Image differences :
No differences that require special attention

Memory differences :
No differences that require special attention
05Commenter 2
Branch [archived branch] has been deleted by Commenter 3.

[revision removed]